Garry Winogrand & the Rolls He Never Saw

NOTE #66. Winograndโ€™s excess shows the limit of volume. Shooting without looking turns authorship into accumulation. The real question isnโ€™t how much you produce, but how much youโ€™re willing to choose. Without editing, photography becomes recording, not seeing.

Green-tinted public phone booths on a sunny street with a man using one, in a color photograph by Garry Winogrand.

ยฉ Garry Winogrand

Garry Winogrand & the Rolls He Never Saw

When Winogrand died, in 1984, he left behind 2,500 undeveloped rolls of film. Another 6,500 that were developed but never looked at. And another 3,000 stuck at the contact-sheet stage. Nearly 300,000 images that he never saw, not even once.

Weโ€™ve been taught to read this fact as extreme dedication, as proof of a productive obsession that only the greats can afford. He himself said he waited at least a year before looking at contact sheets, to separate the emotion of shooting from judgment. But thereโ€™s a point where distance turns into abandonment, and abandonment turns into accumulation without responsibility.

Winogrand shot 400, 500 photos a day. Twelve rolls, every day, for years. At a certain point he wasnโ€™t photographing anymore: he was collecting. And collecting is not the same as looking, choosing, editing. You can have five million images and still not have a body of work, if none of those images has passed through your eyes a second time.

This doesnโ€™t mean Winogrand wasnโ€™t a great photographer. He was. But the myth of volume, the idea that โ€œthe more you shoot, the more chances you have,โ€ has a limit, and he himself crossed it without realizing it. At some point the photographer stops being an author and becomes a living archive, a collector of moments he can no longer control.

So the question isnโ€™t how much youโ€™re willing to shoot, but how much youโ€™re willing to look. If you produce more than you can process, youโ€™re working for those who will come after you, not for yourself. Winogrand left curators and historians the task of deciding what his work was. Maybe it was inevitable, maybe it was an act of trust, or maybe it was just the point where the hunger for images overtook the ability to do something with them.

Not every roll deserves to be developed. Not every photograph deserves to be seen. Winogrand left us this too, unintentionally: proof that shooting without limits can become a way to avoid choosing. And choosing, in the end, is the only thing that distinguishes a photographer from a machine that records.

Marco Savarese
Editor-in-Chief

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Marco Savarese

Marco Savarese is Editor-in-Chief at Eyeshot, the independent publisher he founded in Italy in 2018. He spends most of his year reading portfolios, judging the Open Call, and editing the magazine catalogue. The reading desk is open, and he takes one-to-one Professional Reviews from photographers working seriously on long-term projects.

Book a Professional Review

  • Who Finishes Your Photograph

    Who Finishes Your Photograph

    NOTE #210. A photo isn’t finished until it survives to where people see it. Paul Strand chose hand photogravure for Photographs of Mexico so the printed copy kept the tonal weight of his prints. Protect the tone to the end, or the worst medium decides for you.

    Read More

  • What the Dark Does

    What the Dark Does

    NOTE #209. A face lost in shadow reads as underexposed, a defect to fix. Gordon Willis kept Brando’s eyes in the dark in The Godfather and held it against the studio. Before you rescue a shadow, ask what it does; if you can say it, you decided it.

    Read More

  • The Place After

    The Place After

    NOTE #208. Of a huge event, often only an ordinary place is left. In On This Site (1996) Joel Sternfeld photographed fifty banal American places where violence happened, each with a line of text. Photograph the aftermath, and let the line do the work.

    Read More

  • The Photo Made Together

    The Photo Made Together

    NOTE #206. Street photography teaches you to steal people; there’s another way. In Malick Sidibรฉ’s Bamako studio the youth chose how to be seen. Before you take someone, ask how they’d want to look, and make the photo together.

    Read More

  • Write Your Own Rules

    Write Your Own Rules

    NOTE #205. The thing that improves you most isn’t a new camera, it’s a short list of your own faults. Tony Ray-Jones kept a notebook of orders to himself and it shaped Martin Parr. Write your three rules and keep them in your pocket.

    Read More

  • Watch the Master Work

    Watch the Master Work

    NOTE #204. You don’t learn from a master’s finished prints, you learn from watching them work. In 1962 Joel Meyerowitz watched Robert Frank shoot, quit his job that day, and picked up a camera. Watch the body, not the result.

    Read More

  • The Work Before the Name

    The Work Before the Name

    NOTE #203. The worth of a photo and the worth of the byline are two different things. Koudelka shot the 1968 Prague invasion anonymously as ‘P.P.’ and revealed it sixteen years later. Photograph what must be photographed even when no one will know it was you.

    Read More

  • The Subject You Run From

    The Subject You Run From

    NOTE #202. The strongest subject you have is the one you’d rather not photograph. Ishiuchi Miyako went back to Yokosuka, the occupied base town she was taught to fear, and made it her life’s work. Point the camera where it’s uncomfortable.

    Read More