ยฉ Jonas Bendiksen
If You Straightened It, What Would Remain?
A tilted horizon does not worry me. It makes me curious.
It is one of the few technical choices that, at first glance, I do not read as an automatic mistake. It might be something. It might be nothing. It depends on what is happening in the rest of the frame.
In street and documentary photography the tilted horizon has a precise history. It does not come from aesthetics, it comes from movement. From the photographer crouching, turning, reacting to something happening faster than they can control. In certain cases that inclination is proof that the photographer was inside the scene, not at its edges. It is the physical sign of a presence. The body responding before the mind. And that response reads in the image.
But there is a difference between a tilted horizon that emerges from the scene and one applied as an effect. You recognize the first because everything else in the composition holds. The weights are distributed, the tension has a direction, the tilt feels necessary. You recognize the second because without it the image would be flat. It is there to simulate an energy that was not present. To make a photograph look dynamic when it is not.
As an editor the question I always ask myself is the same: if you straightened that horizon, what would remain? If the photograph holds, the tilt was a choice. If it collapses, it was a crutch.
The problem is not the tilted horizon itself. It is using it to add dynamism to an image that has none. Like unintentional motion blur, like black and white applied afterward, like vertical by default. Every time a tool serves to compensate instead of to build, you can see it. Not always immediately. But in the end you always can.
And the question applies to any technical choice: if you removed it, what would remain?
Marco Savarese
Editor-in-Chief
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Marco Savarese
Marco Savarese is Editor-in-Chief at Eyeshot, the independent publisher he founded in Italy in 2018. He spends most of his year reading portfolios, judging the Open Call, and editing the magazine catalogue. The reading desk is open, and he takes one-to-one Professional Reviews from photographers working seriously on long-term projects.
Who Finishes Your Photograph
NOTE #210. A photo isn’t finished until it survives to where people see it. Paul Strand chose hand photogravure for Photographs of Mexico so the printed copy kept the tonal weight of his prints. Protect the tone to the end, or the worst medium decides for you.
What the Dark Does
NOTE #209. A face lost in shadow reads as underexposed, a defect to fix. Gordon Willis kept Brando’s eyes in the dark in The Godfather and held it against the studio. Before you rescue a shadow, ask what it does; if you can say it, you decided it.
The Place After
NOTE #208. Of a huge event, often only an ordinary place is left. In On This Site (1996) Joel Sternfeld photographed fifty banal American places where violence happened, each with a line of text. Photograph the aftermath, and let the line do the work.
The Photo Made Together
NOTE #206. Street photography teaches you to steal people; there’s another way. In Malick Sidibรฉ’s Bamako studio the youth chose how to be seen. Before you take someone, ask how they’d want to look, and make the photo together.
Write Your Own Rules
NOTE #205. The thing that improves you most isn’t a new camera, it’s a short list of your own faults. Tony Ray-Jones kept a notebook of orders to himself and it shaped Martin Parr. Write your three rules and keep them in your pocket.
Watch the Master Work
NOTE #204. You don’t learn from a master’s finished prints, you learn from watching them work. In 1962 Joel Meyerowitz watched Robert Frank shoot, quit his job that day, and picked up a camera. Watch the body, not the result.
The Work Before the Name
NOTE #203. The worth of a photo and the worth of the byline are two different things. Koudelka shot the 1968 Prague invasion anonymously as ‘P.P.’ and revealed it sixteen years later. Photograph what must be photographed even when no one will know it was you.
The Subject You Run From
NOTE #202. The strongest subject you have is the one you’d rather not photograph. Ishiuchi Miyako went back to Yokosuka, the occupied base town she was taught to fear, and made it her life’s work. Point the camera where it’s uncomfortable.